I thought I’d share with you a quote from a mystery I was re-reading lately … I always enjoy it when characters in detective fiction talk about the conventions of detective fiction. This is from Proof of the Pudding, by Phoebe Atwood Taylor (1945). Asey Mayo, Cape Cod’s “Codfish Sherlock”, is talking to a young woman in Chapter 6.
“… just like the prohibition gangsters that went to the movies so’s to pick up dazzling’ new ideas from mob pictures, murderers today learn quite a lot from stories. They don’t often leave fingerprints around much any more — they’ve even learned to wipe off their trigger-finger print. An’ they don’t rush off an’ leave their victim clutchin’ a convenient swatch of Harris tweed in his limply outstretched hand, either.”
“I’ve always wondered deeply about that tweed angle,” Lois said. “I mean, I’ve got a Harris topcoat I had the year before I went to college, and I defy anyone to jerk a swatch of it off in the best of health, let alone in a dying moment. It simply couldn’t be done. I always thought it would be more accurate if someone’s Harris coat was found with a couple of detached fingernails imbedded in it. They’d certainly give way before the average tweed would. …”
… “No, this don’t conform to book pattern. In fact, Doc Cummings and I cling to the notion that if you run into book clues it mostly only means that someone had access to a lendin’ library. They read about the clues somewheres, an’ left ’em on purpose to snarl you up. A really smart murderer ought to do the same, usual, common everyday things he always does before he commits his crime — an’ the same, usual, common everyday things afterwards, too. A lot of elaborate preparations an’ fancy workin’ up of alibis isn’t bright. For no matter how smart you are in buildin’ things up and weavin’ things into intricate nets, like, there’s always someone smarter who can tear things down an’ pull ’em apart.”
There’s a good deal more on the topic of exotic lipstick shades, cigarette butts and lingering traces of perfume at murder scenes. I hope to have something useful to say on the overall topic of Phoebe Atwood Taylor in the near future, but I couldn’t resist sharing this little piece with you.
I enjoyed this–and I agree about the Harris tweed. It’s practically bullet proof!
Asey is one of my favourite detectives. The settings play an enormous role in the charm which these books exhibit.
I’d like to know how anyone could “clutch” something in a “limply outstretched” hand. But don’t get me wrong, I love me some Asey Mayo.
Good point! I hadn’t considered that … perhaps PAT via Asey was being funny.
Excellent! And what very good points he makes. Am intrigued by the lipstick and perfume too…
I have just been reading a book in which the US version has a makeup clue, but that clue is not there in the UK version. What can that show?
That’s VERY strange. Was it originally a US publication or UK? (Did they take something out, or put something in?)